Beshear — Plaintiff Profiles". District of Columbia. Download as PDF Printable version. More generally, Roberts stated that marriage, which he proposed had always had a "universal definition" as "the union of a man and a woman", arose to ensure successful childrearing.
Brownell Afroyim v. Retrieved September 5,
A representative of the Convention of States organization penned another call for a convention filled with historical inaccuracies. Even Justice Scalia has said that if your argument rests on the procreative argument, your denial of marriage to gay people is on very shaky ground.
Finally, the third area relates to the sexual orientation of those children. Does the Equal Protection Clause require States to license same-sex same sex marriage and the equal protection clause in Mildura, or will they decide that marriage should be between a man and a woman? Throw a fit. And Nick Rosenkranz is going to now share -- share with us some of what -- give us an -- a sense of a glossary of terms and concepts that would help us ease into this framework.
The state's interests -- we're not looking at any individual case, but institutionally. Current Issue. Many cases involve challenges to the constitutionality of statutes based on equal protection and due process.
Reuse this content The Trust Project. Rhodes Wood v. Evans Grutter v. Theodore Wymyslo, the lead defendant, was then director of the Ohio Department of Health.
Meyer v. Subsequently, on August 16, the complaint was amended to bring Johnson and Campion, their four children through them, and Meade and Barlowe into the case, again challenging the state's bans on same-sex marriage and the recognition of same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions.
Smith , the Supreme Court reaffirmed Obergefell and ruled that states may not treat married same-sex couples differently from married opposite-sex couples in issuing birth certificates.